범위 기반 for 루프를 사용할 때 반복기가 필요합니다.
현재 다음과 같이 범위 기반 루프 만 수행 할 수 있습니다.
for (auto& value : values)
그러나 때로는 참조 대신 값에 대한 반복자가 필요합니다 (어떤 이유로 든). 값을 비교하는 전체 벡터를 거치지 않고 방법이 있습니까?
이전 for
루프를 다음과 같이 사용하십시오 .
for (auto it = values.begin(); it != values.end(); ++it )
{
auto & value = *it;
//...
}
이것으로 당신은 value
iterator뿐만 아니라 it
. 사용하고 싶은 것을 사용하십시오.
편집하다:
권장하지는 않지만 범위 기반 for
루프 를 사용하려면 (예, 어떤 이유로 든 : D) 다음을 수행 할 수 있습니다.
auto it = std::begin(values); //std::begin is a free function in C++11
for (auto& value : values)
{
//Use value or it - whatever you need!
//...
++it; //at the end OR make sure you do this in each iteration
}
이 접근 방식은 및 항상 동기화되어 value
있으므로 주어진 검색을 피 합니다.value
it
다음은 자신의 변수에 별칭을 지정하여 숨겨진 반복기를 노출 할 수있는 프록시 래퍼 클래스입니다.
#include <memory>
#include <iterator>
/* Only provides the bare minimum to support range-based for loops.
Since the internal iterator of a range-based for is inaccessible,
there is no point in more functionality here. */
template< typename iter >
struct range_iterator_reference_wrapper
: std::reference_wrapper< iter > {
iter &operator++() { return ++ this->get(); }
decltype( * std::declval< iter >() ) operator*() { return * this->get(); }
range_iterator_reference_wrapper( iter &in )
: std::reference_wrapper< iter >( in ) {}
friend bool operator!= ( range_iterator_reference_wrapper const &l,
range_iterator_reference_wrapper const &r )
{ return l.get() != r.get(); }
};
namespace unpolluted {
/* Cannot call unqualified free functions begin() and end() from
within a class with members begin() and end() without this hack. */
template< typename u >
auto b( u &c ) -> decltype( begin( c ) ) { return begin( c ); }
template< typename u >
auto e( u &c ) -> decltype( end( c ) ) { return end( c ); }
}
template< typename iter >
struct range_proxy {
range_proxy( iter &in_first, iter in_last )
: first( in_first ), last( in_last ) {}
template< typename T >
range_proxy( iter &out_first, T &in_container )
: first( out_first ),
last( unpolluted::e( in_container ) ) {
out_first = unpolluted::b( in_container );
}
range_iterator_reference_wrapper< iter > begin() const
{ return first; }
range_iterator_reference_wrapper< iter > end()
{ return last; }
iter &first;
iter last;
};
template< typename iter >
range_proxy< iter > visible_range( iter &in_first, iter in_last )
{ return range_proxy< iter >( in_first, in_last ); }
template< typename iter, typename container >
range_proxy< iter > visible_range( iter &first, container &in_container )
{ return range_proxy< iter >( first, in_container ); }
용법:
#include <vector>
#include <iostream>
std::vector< int > values{ 1, 3, 9 };
int main() {
// Either provide one iterator to see it through the whole container...
std::vector< int >::iterator i;
for ( auto &value : visible_range( i, values ) )
std::cout << "# " << i - values.begin() << " = " << ++ value << '\n';
// ... or two iterators to see the first incremented up to the second.
auto j = values.begin(), end = values.end();
for ( auto &value : visible_range( j, end ) )
std::cout << "# " << j - values.begin() << " = " << ++ value << '\n';
}
I tried myself on this and found a solution.
Usage:
for(auto i : ForIterator(some_list)) {
// i is the iterator, which was returned by some_list.begin()
// might be useful for whatever reason
}
The implementation was not that difficult:
template <typename T> struct Iterator {
T& list;
typedef decltype(list.begin()) I;
struct InnerIterator {
I i;
InnerIterator(I i) : i(i) {}
I operator * () { return i; }
I operator ++ () { return ++i; }
bool operator != (const InnerIterator& o) { return i != o.i; }
};
Iterator(T& list) : list(list) {}
InnerIterator begin() { return InnerIterator(list.begin()); }
InnerIterator end() { return InnerIterator(list.end()); }
};
template <typename T> Iterator<T> ForIterator(T& list) {
return Iterator<T>(list);
}
range based for
loop is created as the c++ counterpart for foreach
in java that allows easy iteration of array elements. It is meant for removing the usage of complex structures like iterators so as to make it simple. I you want an iterator
, as Nawaz said, you will have to use normal for
loop.
There is a very simple way of doing this for std::vector
, which should also work if you are resizing the vector during the process (I'm not sure whether the accepted answer considers this case)
If b
is your vector, you can just do
for(auto &i:b){
auto iter = b.begin() + (&i-&*(b.begin()));
}
where iter
will be your required iterator.
This takes advantage of the fact that C++ vectors are always contiguous.
Let's do it very dirty ... I know, the 0x70h is changing with stack-usage, compiler version, .... It should be exposed by the compiler, but it is not :-(
char* uRBP = 0; __asm { mov uRBP, rbp }
Iterator** __pBegin = (Iterator**)(uRBP+0x70);
for (auto& oEntry : *this) {
if (oEntry == *pVal) return (*__pBegin)->iPos;
}
참고URL : https://stackoverflow.com/questions/6953128/need-iterator-when-using-ranged-based-for-loops
'Development Tip' 카테고리의 다른 글
Event.target이 Typescript의 요소가 아닌 이유는 무엇입니까? (0) | 2020.10.05 |
---|---|
Javascript "Uncaught TypeError : object is not a function"연관성 질문 (0) | 2020.10.05 |
팬더의 for 루프가 정말 나쁜가요? (0) | 2020.10.05 |
Python 코드의 들여 쓰기를 중괄호로 변환하는 방법이 있습니까? (0) | 2020.10.05 |
ASP MVC : IController Dispose ()는 언제 호출됩니까? (0) | 2020.10.05 |